Guest TurboSedan Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thabulldog Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 Lock this damn thread, its getting no where. Oh yeah, free post. free post, what's that??? It means that this thread becomes "Fuck Jr." Ladies and Gentlemen, get your fucks in now before it gets fucking locked. Fuckin fuck i dont fucking feel like goin to fuckin work at 3 fuckin 30 stupid fuckin pizza i wish it would fuckin deliver itself. As pertaining to the thread title, as I said b4, 3.1= no way near 300, n thats final, have a nice day 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegeta Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 http://60degreev6.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=490 like I said...its not a 3.1l anymore but its based off one. There are others used in the midget racing class that are over 300 im sure, but you lose your streetability with something like that NA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90lum31v6euro Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 this is some interesting shit i will have to agree with the others 300 is not an acheiveable goal you'd have to throw in an aggressive cam, hi flow fuel rail/injectors, high pressure fuel pump, intake/headers/exhaust, port an polish, a shit load of block tricks [ex. boring and stroking it out... (now it wont be the stock displacement of 3.1, so there goes any attemp of keeping it relatively close to the stock #)] computer tuning, engine internals (ex high compression pistons, rods, crank, crane cam roller tip rockers....), and ud have to run some sort of race fuel so u dont kill the engine.... shoot for 250, its a much better looking number for our motors and it wont cost u as much, making 110 more horse power is easier than 160 more horsepower sneaking in b4 the lock down, hell yea! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pblunt_ Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 this is some interesting shit i will have to agree with the others 300 is not an acheiveable goal you'd have to throw in an aggressive cam, hi flow fuel rail/injectors, high pressure fuel pump, intake/headers/exhaust, port an polish, a shit load of block tricks [ex. boring and stroking it out... (now it wont be the stock displacement of 3.1, so there goes any attemp of keeping it relatively close to the stock #)] computer tuning, engine internals (ex high compression pistons, rods, crank, crane cam roller tip rockers....), and ud have to run some sort of race fuel so u dont kill the engine.... shoot for 250, its a much better looking number for our motors and it wont cost u as much, making 110 more horse power is easier than 160 more horsepower sneaking in b4 the lock down, hell yea! yeah what he said :withstupid: Also in before the lock, so lock this thread we are far from the topic now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90lum31v6euro Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 oh, i know u didnt just bust on my shit with the im with stupid icon not cool but ill forgive u this time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegeta Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 mother fuckers, learn to fucking read assholes. I posted a link to a 3.1 based block making well over 300 NA and you fucking tell me its not fucking achievable! GOD DAMN IT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian P Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 Some peoples offspring LOL.....so if it's bored out, it's no longer the same engine as a 3.1L? Dang I guess mine's considered like an Acura engine now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robby1870 Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 Some peoples offspring LOL.....so if it's bored out, it's no longer the same engine as a 3.1L? Dang I guess mine's considered like an Acura engine now... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegeta Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 Fuck your fucking acura wanna be piece of shit, you god damn douche bag ass eater! hahaha, i was trying to keep this the new fuck thread but some people can't follow my lead:P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pblunt_ Posted February 14, 2004 Report Share Posted February 14, 2004 oh, i know u didnt just bust on my shit with the im with stupid iconnot cool but ill forgive u this time... sorry bro, only thing I could find that says I'm with this guy(damn that sounds gay) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riktar Posted February 17, 2004 Report Share Posted February 17, 2004 ME WANTS, ME WANTS! That page is bookmarked and will be a weekly visit to find out when the V6 model comes out! I am assuming from reading that the draw is pretty heavy on the battery since they mention a recharge time (15 minutes?) to get the battery back up for the next run. I wonder if mounting a 2nd battery in the trunk with a switched setup (Similar to what plow and RV vehicles use to run their additional 12V components) would lessen the time in between charges? I am just thinking how awkward it would be to blow somwone off at one red light and then explain why you can't "Go again" for the next 15 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excelsior Posted February 18, 2004 Report Share Posted February 18, 2004 wow how did this all happen? People should ummm calm down maybe? Anyways, yes its doable. Difficult? Very. I think the cost would be very high, and also drivability would fall tremendously. Obviously it has been done. It just depends on how much time & $$$ you are willing to invest. Good luck man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
89oldscutlass Posted February 19, 2004 Report Share Posted February 19, 2004 Sounds like a leaf blower from hell. I think the electric supercharger subject has been brought up before. I was thinking of getting a Kerby vacum cleaner and hooking it up to my intake to suck air in. That will be the next thing they come up with, Hell it cost about the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonyman87 Posted February 19, 2004 Report Share Posted February 19, 2004 Sounds like a leaf blower from hell. I think the electric supercharger subject has been brought up before. I was thinking of getting a Kerby vacum cleaner and hooking it up to my intake to suck air in. That will be the next thing they come up with, Hell it cost about the same. i have the eram one and it works pretty good! and yeah it does sound like a vacume cleaner when the hoods up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intlcutlass Posted February 19, 2004 Report Share Posted February 19, 2004 Sounds like a leaf blower from hell. I think the electric supercharger subject has been brought up before. I was thinking of getting a Kerby vacum cleaner and hooking it up to my intake to suck air in. That will be the next thing they come up with, Hell it cost about the same. Thats Kirby........ 3.1 n/a @ 300 ponies.... Not likely to happen. It is possible, but it would take well more cash than what it's worth. If I can ask, why are you so Non-turbo?.. It's the easiest & cheepest way to get to the kinda power your talking about. Even on a 3.1, you would still need about a t3/t4 to do it. No flame intended here, I was just looking for a little more backround on your thoughts here..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topless94style Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 FUCK....ASS in b4 da lock I am all for turbos/sc on smaller than V8 engines. But for V8s, for somereason i would much rather have all raw NA power. Then when i get board of that, on comes the 8:71 blower. Turbos are a good source of power...look at the import engines...the lancer, w/o the turbo its fucking slow as fucking fuck, but with the turbo i guess it kinda fucking fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutsup1996 Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 damn Kirbys are badass, we got one and i use it on my car all the time, after I squeege the body dry, then hook up the blower system on the Kirby and blow dry the rest of it to get it bone dry, and no streaks! sucks like a mofo too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWeb80 Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 My God, how did I miss this Fucking Flame thread.......wow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudefyet Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 sucks like a mofo too You sound like you've had a little too much experience there j/k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TurboSedan Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 Turbos are a good source of power...look at the import engines...the lancer, w/o the turbo its fucking slow as fucking fuck, but with the turbo i guess it kinda fucking fast. my twin brother's '87 Shelby Lancer #127 (my GTSs twin) will kill about anything around here. oh wait are you talking about that Mitsubishi thing? joshua Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
89oldscutlass Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 I have a question about turbos since its been brought up. I had a guy come in the garage and was telling me that the sidewinder turbos that come on the Ford diesel trucks were a awsome on cars needing a replacement turbo. Is there any truth to it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topless94style Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 Turbos are a good source of power...look at the import engines...the lancer, w/o the turbo its fucking slow as fucking fuck, but with the turbo i guess it kinda fucking fast. my twin brother's '87 Shelby Lancer #127 (my GTSs twin) will kill about anything around here. oh wait are you talking about that Mitsubishi thing? joshua Ya, i was talking about the mitsu, forgot chrysler made those too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfewtrail Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 I have a question about turbos since its been brought up. I had a guy come in the garage and was telling me that the sidewinder turbos that come on the Ford diesel trucks were a awsome on cars needing a replacement turbo. Is there any truth to it? The turbos on the Diesels are likely bigger is why he's saying they're a good replacement. I'll have to take a look at my friends 7.3 turbocharged powerstroke diesel and see what turbo is on it one day soon. I know a great deal of dodges come with large Holset turbos(good for gobs of power). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
913_4se Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 this motor has that and more just an idea http://www.angelfire.com/stars/mycaddy/asg.htm#Price%20List Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.