god910 Posted December 11, 2002 Report Share Posted December 11, 2002 Ok, here's the deal. I got a 3800 Series II and I have been told if I want to turbo I should get an L67 well I don't have one my is N/A. One of the mechanics at the dealership I used to work at called me and told me he had a motor for me. It's a 3800 series II with about 50,000 miles. The intake gasket let go and leaked some collant into the block and hydro'd a cylinder . The car still runs and drives but knocks. SO he put a motor out of a Pontiac in there and swapped the intake from the Pontiac to the other motor (the other had a MAF in the inlet). I need new rods anyway, can I get a rotating mass from an L67 for this block? Is there any other differences. I am not going to go super crazy boost wise but I WANT to do this. This will be swapped into my 92 Cutlass. (A while back I got beat by a V6 Camaro :oops: and that won't do) I also don't have a wiring harness or PCM for this. Since I am not going to go crazy with boost can I use an L67 PCM and use boost signal the same or no? Any help would be appreciated. I asked on another board and they were no help. Thanks alot. Jay Warfel Muncie, IN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2002 Report Share Posted December 11, 2002 I do not recommend using the 3800. Yes it is a pushrod motor, but it is not a 60*. It is a 90*, and there are some issues with it. you run the risk of blowing it up for starters. The SC gets a re-inforced block, but the NA does not. Also, it does not have a regular piston/connecting rod/crank setup. It is a split pin setup (that I personally do not like). Basically, what that is, is instead of having 1 connecting rod to every lobe in the crank, with a total of 6 lobes, there are only 3 lobes, and the connecting rods share. 2 rods to every lobe. With that setup, you run the risk of them catching just righ, and throwing a rod, meaning, one of the pistons is going to come out to say hello. I recommend going with a 60* motor for a turbo setup, or if you just ABSOLUTLY have to have a 3800, then try to get the SC one. At least it has a stronger block. Taylor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 11, 2002 Report Share Posted December 11, 2002 also, as to being beat by a camero, it is not unusual for that. For startes, that car is lighter, and depending on the year, then it either has a 3400, or a 3800. I am not sure about the 3800, but I do know that the 3400 that they put in there is diferant in the way it is tuned than the 3400 they put in the Grand Am's, Alero's, and Impala's. I do not know if the 3800 they use is a 60* or a 90*, and I have not looked into it seeing that if I go buy one, then I will get the V-8. Taylor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2002 Report Share Posted December 12, 2002 I believe the 3800 (acutally the 3800 Series II) in the Camero is the same as in FWD cars. it will be a 200HP 90degree version with a ton of torgue (225ftlbs). I have seen stock performance test numbers of these cars in the low 7s 0-60 So unless you have a healthy 3.4DOHC or a very tricked out 3.1/3100, I wouldn't consider racing one. The easiest way to tell is if it has the 98 and newer from nose, stay away. It will eat you, even the V6. Now the older 3400 cards were a tad slow, but still faster than the V6 version Mustangs of the same year. it still was not quick, but probably as good or better than most 3100 powered W-bodies. I have a question about the TGPs I have seen the original performance numbers on these things, are they running better now with age? or are most of them tricked out by the owners that they are running high 13? or even 14's for that matter. I thought I remember seeing tests putting their 0-60 around the mid 8's. If someone has some links to old test articles, I'd love to read them again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2002 Report Share Posted December 12, 2002 I also mention the TGP thing since my first car was a 89' Sunbird GT turbo. I clearly remember a wonderful fight for about 5 stop lights, and 5 miles of road. I constantly and completely trounced on it from a start, was about 2 and a half car lenghts ahead by 60, and held it off until around 95. That and my turbo car was only the 3sp auto. I miss that car too. *sobs* I had the old Vericom performance computer, and could constistantly run sub 7.4 0-60s and 15.8's in the quarter. It never ran slower (with it hot, and poor launch) 7.8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2002 Report Share Posted December 12, 2002 HUH! I just found a Road and Track test... 7.0 and 15.3 I must be thinking of a Car and Driver article.. tops speed of 128... Hmmm..... Though not all cars, even the same model, are created equal. :oops: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest RedCutlassSL Posted December 12, 2002 Report Share Posted December 12, 2002 Just to let you all know, I once throughly kicked a 95 Camaro V6 ass. I had him the entire way. And remember, I've got the 3100, and this guy had a stick I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 13, 2002 Report Share Posted December 13, 2002 Yeah, the older 3.4L powered camaros aren't impressive. The V6 Mustangs are even worse. I raced some dude in a convertable with a company vehicle (Ford Explorer XLT with the 4L V6). I won. :guns: FORD Hey I had no choice in driving the Ford. Hell, it was peppy, also took out a automatic Subaru 2.5RS, and riced out early 90's Eclipse with that thing, heheh. Ok so that should have all been in the racing section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 14, 2002 Report Share Posted December 14, 2002 I do not recommend using the 3800. Yes it is a pushrod motor, but it is not a 60*. It is a 90*, and there are some issues with it. you run the risk of blowing it up for starters. The SC gets a re-inforced block, but the NA does not. Also, it does not have a regular piston/connecting rod/crank setup. It is a split pin setup (that I personally do not like). Basically, what that is, is instead of having 1 connecting rod to every lobe in the crank, with a total of 6 lobes, there are only 3 lobes, and the connecting rods share. 2 rods to every lobe. With that setup, you run the risk of them catching just righ, and throwing a rod, meaning, one of the pistons is going to come out to say hello. I recommend going with a 60* motor for a turbo setup, or if you just ABSOLUTLY have to have a 3800, then try to get the SC one. At least it has a stronger block. Taylor Aren't many V-8's like that...with two rods per journal? Oh, I just saw this on the ThrasherEP website...this is a crank from a L67 SC engine... http://www.turboste.com/crank.gif Is that split-pin design? Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
god910 Posted December 15, 2002 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 If they weren't then they would be like 7 feet long. I just didn't want to say anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 Split pin is when they take the pins and split them. I don't know of any V-8's that have a split pin setup (unless it is a 90* V-8). Every crank that I have seen from a v8 has been just like the one the one in my 2.8 except that it has 2 more lobes, and one more main. If you take the crank out of a 60* motor, then you will find that there is one pisten for every connecting rod, and each connecting rod is attached to it's own lobe on the crank. In the 3800, there is 1 piston per connecting rod, but 2 connecting rods per lobe in the crank. Basically, if I were to take a 3800 crank and try to put it into anything other than a 3800, it would be a 3-cylinder. Likewise, if I were to put a 2.8 crank into a 3800, it would be a possible to make it work (not really, but the 3800 has only 3 lobes to work with, and the 2.8 has 6 lobes to work with). I do not know of a single V8 that GM is making right now that uses a split pin setup, but if you do know of one, then please let me know, so that i can look into it to learn how they keep it from blowing up. Just one more little FACT that you might like to know. It took GM 5 years to make the 2.8/3.1 to a point where it did not blow pistons. It has taken GM 30 years to get the 3800 where it is now, and only the 3800 SERIES 1, and the 3.8 TURBO are the only ones that are not prone to blowing pistons. That is why I stick to the 60* motors. I have a 2.8 with 312,000 miles on it (it just rolled over today) and I do not have a single problem with it. It is complete BONE STOCK with the exception of the programming being switched to the 1989 programming, and I put a new cam shaft in it. The original cam was over 50% worn away, but I was getting 35 miles per gallon. Just no performance. Aside from that, the motor is all original (only replaced things that are replaced in routine maintenance) and it is still going very strong, but I do not know of a single 3800 over 200,000. Taylor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 Thats some good info. I thought all chevy v-8's are 90 degree? I understand what you are saying about 60 degree v6s lasting a long time, but I've heard really good things about 3800's too. Here are some pics of cranks... Chevy V8, (split pin?-2 rods per journal) http://www.turboste.com/v8-crank.jpg and a L67 crank (not split pin?, 1 rod per journal) http://www.turboste.com/crank.gif Am I not understanding what split pin design means? Are there some 3800s that aren't split pin? I'm not trying to be an asshole, I'm just trying to clarify things for myself. Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
god910 Posted December 15, 2002 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 I can honestly say that of all the V-8 cranks I have seen they all share 2 rods per lobe. As far as split pin, from what I understand it doesn't have anything to do with the pin, it is the lobe of the crank... I was wrong once before. Here is a link to the Ford V-10 split pin. Read about the Triton 6.8 split pin. http://www.northcountyford.com/trucks/f-450/ford_f-450.asp And here is a page showin the pic of a split pin crankshaft. Mercedes I believe... http://www.manufacturingcenter.com/tooling/archives/0600/0600tu.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 I see, so split pin actually means the crankshaft connecting rod journals are seperated....for example the 60 degree v6 has a split pin crank, so does the L67 crank (see pic in above post). But the above picture of the V8 crank is NOT a split pin setup. When you "split" the pins, you are seperating the crankshaft journals for each connecting rod. So because my Turbo 3.1 has a seperate journal for each rod, it is a split pin design. Almost all V8s are NOT the split pin design. I'm assuming that since the 3800 L67 (SC) engine uses a split pin design, all the S2 3800's do. I've never had a S1 3800 apart yet, so I don't know about those. But once I get the S1 3800 for my turbo build, I'll check that out. But, my Chevy Performance book sez: "Chevrolet Special Products strongly recommends forged steel common-pin (not split pin) cranks for all maximum effort racing engines. The recommended crankshaft configuration for competition V6/90 engines is referred to as common pin journal design. A common pin V6 crankshaft has rod journals which are not offset; the connecting rods on each throw are side-by-side. This design provides more bearing area and less rod offset that a splayed pin (split-pin) crank." Word. Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 that is right but backwards. split pin is when they split the connecting rod, not the crank. The 60* is not a split pin, but the 90* is. Also, that mercedes crank is a split pin setup. You see how it has 2 connecting rods right next to each other? The 3800 is like that however, there is no differance in height. They are right next to each other without a differance in hieght so instead of it looking like there are 6 journals, there are only 3 wide ones. I will try to find some pics. Taylor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 So the Chevy Performance book is wrong? That isn't what split pin means? And that second picture I posted above is from a L67 Series 2 3800 SC engine. That crank looks just like the crank in my Turbo 3.1 60 degree V6. How is that 3800 crank a split pin design and my Turbo 3.1 crank isn't? One more time a comparision... L67 Series 2 3800 Crankshaft... Turbo 3.1 V6 60 degree Crankshaft... Chevy V8 Crankshaft... So can you tell me how the 3800 crank is a split pin setup and the 60 degree v6 crank isnt? It clear the v8 crank isn't a split pin setup. There are 3 pictures of the engines we are talking about. Please tell me why the 3800 crank is split pin and the turbo 3.1 crank isn't. Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 you notice how the 1&2, 3&4, and 5&6 are almost even with each other on the 3800, but how in the 60* one, they are farther away from each other? That is how. That is also why the 3800 needs a balance shaft, and the 60* does not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 15, 2002 Report Share Posted December 15, 2002 You are right about the 3800 needing a balance shaft because the lobes aren't seperated that much. But split pin (splayed pin) means that NONE of the connecting rods share a lobe. The 3800 and 3.1 cranks are good examples. Sure, the 3800 is like only 20 degrees apart and the 3.1 is more like 90 degrees apart; that is why the 3.1 doesn't have a balance shaft and the 3800 does. But a non split pin (common pin) crank means that 2 rods SHARE a lobe. The V8 crank is a great example. It's either they share a lobe, or they don't. Regardless of how far apart they are. All of that aside, I don't feel as though the crank design makes the 3800 a bad engine. I feel as though a 3800 can be built to survive just as much as a 3.1. Example, 3.8 Turbo GN. Yes, it's rear wheel drive, but it's still a 90 degree V6. Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
god910 Posted December 16, 2002 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 So, would I be better off with a S1 3800 N/A block for my turbo motor or what? I just want to turbo a 3800 and put it in my Cutlass that's all. Help me do this please. Before you tell me it's a bad idea, give me good ideas about downpipe routing, max d/p size, turbo placement, I/C piping and placement. Any info would be great, as long as it's telling me how, and not how not to, do this swap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Yea, sorry I got out of hand there. Kinda traveled away from the topic. Well, I can tell you how I plan on doing the Turbo 3800 in my Cutlass... First, I'm not sure if I'm going to use a Series 1 or 2...I'm thinking of a Series 1. There will need to be better pistons, rods, cam, rings, blah, blah. OF course a L67 block would be a great idea as it's mostly upgraded and it is built for boost, but you'll need to figure out how to plug the injector holes in the heads so you can use the holes in the intake manifold that you'll need to use from a N/A 3800. Not a lot of work...but I'm still not decided on that one. But, the crossover will need to be custom, and the exhaust manifolds might be too. I'm going to make a 2.5 or 3 inch downpipe, and wrap it in header wrap after it gets JotHot coated. As for turbo placement, I'm going to go with roughly a TGP setup. That way I won't have to spend cash on a custom intercooler and I won't have to spend a lot of time reinventing the wheel. I like the placement of everything on the TGPs. Then which trans? I've got a built 4T60-E and a HM-282 5 speed. I'm thinking 4T60-e because they are easier to launch/drive/race. But the manual is fun too. I still need to decide. Lastly, and most importantly, the electrionics. Maybe a TGP wiring harness/chip? Maybe something else? I'm not sure yet. Hope this stuff helps, and watch my site for news about this project...I'll be starting it in a few months. I need to do some major planning/testing before I start something like this. Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGPilot Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Then which trans? I've got a built 4T60-E and a HM-282 5 speed. I'm thinking 4T60-e because they are easier to launch/drive/race. But the manual is fun too. I still need to decide. Jason Auto cars are easier to drive, but you lose so much wheel power with one. Nothing like the feeling of pure power to the ground and not a tranny slipping and shifting!! Just the though of having that huge weight on the end of the crank called a torque converter!! I would never go back to an Auto tranny in my TGP. I would definitely run a different clutch though 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Yea, I would need to spend some cash on a clutch...but I've already got the complete rebuilt trans already...so I could just drop it in. I agree about the feeling of power with the 5-speed. But the auto I built in my TurboSTE is holding up fine, without slipping so far. Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GnatGoSplat Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Taylor, after looking at the L67 crank pics, I don't know how you can say: They are right next to each other without a differance in hieght so instead of it looking like there are 6 journals, there are only 3 wide ones. I will try to find some pics. The pic clearly shows 6 separate journals on that crank. The 1-2 and 3-4 journals look to me like they have significant differences in height. Also, everything I've read says the 3800 Series II SC and NA blocks are one and the same. I believe this to be true, because in the parts catalog the only part #'s that don't match between the L67 and L36 are the pistons, wrist pins, and connecting rods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse5302 Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Thats what I was trying to say. I'm glad I'm not losing it / seeing things... Thats cool, I can just get a N/A block and upgrade the pistons/rods/etc. I think the heads are different too, Shawn. They've got holes tapped for the injectors (because there is no room to put them in the intake monifold with the SC in the way). Are there different part numbers for them too? Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GnatGoSplat Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Right, the heads and intake manifolds are different as well. I was just focusing on the bottom end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.