Michael Savage Posted April 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2014 Actually it's designed around 2 to 12 stroke and offers most engine prebuilt to stock specs. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych0matt Posted April 10, 2014 Report Share Posted April 10, 2014 I'm just going to leave this right here... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Savage Posted April 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2014 Yes but back to the topic. So using the 3900 block is sadly out of the question. So easiest way would be a 3500 with a good amount of tweaking Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euro Posted April 10, 2014 Report Share Posted April 10, 2014 This sounds like an awful lot of brain function to make little power. throw in a 3500 and attach a snail to it. Bam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy K Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 (edited) let me ask a stupid question: What about just getting a 3900 and disabling the VVT? Also, no matter what you do, DO NOT use small port 3100 intakes on whatever you build. It would be like duct taping your face shut in the middle of a marathon. You could go large port 3100 for a sleeper look (such as 01 GP, same parts as the 3400 except the number on top) and the sensors you speak of are easy to work through, most are the same.... and the question of what is not the same depends on your choice of PCM and programming. Edited April 11, 2014 by Crazy K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Savage Posted April 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Sounds perfect, but how would you disable the VVT without disabling the valves as a whole? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skitchin Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Sounds perfect, but how would you disable the VVT without disabling the valves as a whole? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Savage Posted April 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Patrick picture was what I was suspecting to see for some reason lol Wouldn't you have trouble swapping over to roller rockers and I'm not sure if VVT uses lifters. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skitchin Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 And if it's at all like what GM does on the LS engines, main differences for VVT will be the timing cover, cam position sensor, cam gear, and the cam itself. ^This. My layman's understanding is that VVT advances valve timing by using a cam phaser in the timing cover. As Turbocharged400sbc mentioned a couple pages back, there's ways you could rig the timing system up rather than deleting it. id bet you could do it, even to the point of using a manual rpm triggered vvt control scheme if ya wanted... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Savage Posted April 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 I'll look into it and see if I can find anything Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.