RobertISaar Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 i was checking out all of the stuff at code59 the other day and i've been kicking an idea around in my head for a few days, and i think i have it sane enough to be able to explain it a bit... why can't we just make our own codemask? i see patches and the like for other masks that turn the VE table from like 8x10 to 16x23 or something crazy like that. so in that same train of thought i came up with: an entirely new codemask that is entirely mapped so we know what every function is, what all the tables do/ where they're located, be able to set options like lean cruise, egr diagnostics, any size of ve/spark tables, electronic tranny control, anything... i would think we would need at least 2 versions though: 1 for SD and one for MAF systems, or maybe there could be a option in the definition to switch back and forth using the same mask. if i knew how to do this myself i wouldn't ask, but i'm lost once people start talking about disassemblies and the like. but from what i figure is whith the collective knowledge of everyone that knows how to write a codemask definition, this should be possible, right? i mean GM made a couple dozen codemasks using the same basic hardware, so why can't we? by the way this is going to be up at 60* too, so i can help progress this idea faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.