Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Psych0matt

    Psych0matt

    Members


    • Points

      28

    • Posts

      11,082


  2. 94 olds vert

    94 olds vert

    Contributing Member


    • Points

      20

    • Posts

      9,298


  3. primergray

    primergray

    Members


    • Points

      6

    • Posts

      362


  4. pwmin

    pwmin

    Members


    • Points

      5

    • Posts

      4,684


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 05/31/2026 in all areas

  1. Aceknox23

    New to this place. Hello.

    Hi, I have a 92 Chevy Lumina Z34 automatic with the V6 DOHC. It's all stock. I am new to fixing cars and got it a year ago. Any tips or suggestions is appreciated. The current thing I'm working on it wiring and brakes.
    3 points
  2. Psych0matt

    New to this place. Hello.

    I'm glad that joke is still funny
    2 points
  3. 94 olds vert

    New to this place. Hello.

    I thought the same thing, but then I saw the valance is intact so you know it's fine.
    2 points
  4. RPE1992GPSE

    Should I go back to stock?

    This, kids, is why this website is the fucking best when it comes to W-Bodies.
    2 points
  5. 55trucker

    New to this place. Hello.

    Nice car...1st thing you might consider is removing that led light bar right in the centre of the path for the air intake for the a/c condenser & the rad.
    1 point
  6. carkhz316

    The Holy Grail - Rebuilding the Getrag 284 5TM60

    Bumping for any more adventures that anyone may have had with the 284. I have about 1000 miles on my LS4/ 284 combo and all seems well. I have two additional 284s in need of different repairs that I could/ would like to combine to make one like-new unit.
    1 point
  7. 55trucker

    Wheel fit

    Psssst....hint *move the calipers inboard*
    1 point
  8. GnatGoSplat

    Should I go back to stock?

    Oh, I didn't know about the J-bodies having the same radio, but it makes sense. I think some 3rd-gen F-bodies used the same radio as the Grand Prix. I'd read the same thing about the amps on the GMT400 forum while searching for info on these, as I'd wondered if I could just replace my CDM module rather than repairing it, but ended up deciding that'd be pointless as probably all of them need those capacitors by now. Anyway, I can confirm the amplifiers are 100% the same between the non-EQ and 5-band EQ models. There is no difference whatsoever between the amplifier stages. They're both using a pair of Delco DM165 2-channel amplifier ICs. In fact, I used my 5-EQ CDM (from GP radio) as a DM165 donor for my non-EQ Cutlass radio because one of its DM165s was blown. There's only one difference between the non-EQ and 5-EQ models and that's the presence of the EQ IC. In the non-EQ model, there are shorting jumpers (yellow arrows in the image) to connect the EQ input solder pads to EQ output pads. That said, there is a newer CDM with different amplifier ICs. You can tell them apart because the amplifier heatsink has vertical fins instead of horizontal. It's very likely that one does have more powerful amps. In this pic, top is old (like I have) and bottom is the newer one. The GMT400 thread did mention the old and new style are completely interchangeable. They communicate via E&C Databus, which has been somewhat hacked. https://stuartschmitt.com/e_and_c_bus/ I think Tech 1 and Tech 2 have the ability to read it with the right cartridge and cable. If it uses a CDM similar like the top one in the previous pic, then I'd bet on it.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...