95cutlass Posted July 14 Report Posted July 14 (edited) Super stoked for this one! Just picked up this 93 tonight. One owner Michigan car! Not a spec of rust accept for around the windshield trim! Undercarriage looks virtually new! Has been sitting since 19, so some gremlins to work through! New top, but not a documented time of replacement. Has the usual oil leaks etc, and a horn / headlamp issue. But I am looking forward to getting acquainted with it! I think it’ll be a good pairing for my 95 as well. Edited July 14 by 95cutlass Spelling issue pwmin, 94 olds vert, rich_e777 and 2 others 3 2 Quote
jmjp5055 Posted July 16 Report Posted July 16 Nice color, very clean looking. if you’re looking for parts there is a group called 5th generation cutlass supreme , also another group called LQ1 3.4 twin duel cam V6. Good luck with your new cutlass 95cutlass 1 Quote
rich_e777 Posted July 16 Report Posted July 16 Very interesting, you have both a rear sway bar and the auxiliary springs. I always thought it was one or the other. Very nice find! jiggity76, jmjp5055 and 95cutlass 3 Quote
jiggity76 Posted July 16 Report Posted July 16 (edited) 2 hours ago, rich_e777 said: Very interesting, you have both a rear sway bar and the auxiliary springs. I always thought it was one or the other. Very nice find! My 93 STE and 96 Cutlass sedan don't have the big rubber springs...but DO have sway bars. But...my 91 International has BOTH. Is that what you're referring too? Here's the STE. And then the International. Edited July 16 by jiggity76 95cutlass, rich_e777 and jmjp5055 3 Quote
95cutlass Posted July 17 Author Report Posted July 17 11 hours ago, jmjp5055 said: Nice color, very clean looking. if you’re looking for parts there is a group called 5th generation cutlass supreme , also another group called LQ1 3.4 twin duel cam V6. Good luck with your new cutlass Thank you! I am part of the 5th generation group! But will have to take a look at adding the other one. It should make for a fun project for now! jmjp5055 1 Quote
95cutlass Posted July 17 Author Report Posted July 17 8 hours ago, rich_e777 said: Very interesting, you have both a rear sway bar and the auxiliary springs. I always thought it was one or the other. Very nice find! Thank you! jmjp5055 1 Quote
rich_e777 Posted July 17 Report Posted July 17 18 hours ago, jiggity76 said: My 93 STE and 96 Cutlass sedan don't have the big rubber springs...but DO have sway bars. But...my 91 International has BOTH. Is that what you're referring too? Here's the STE. And then the International. Yes, those figure 8 shaped springs cushioning the lateral links. My `94 3100 CS only has these aux. springs while my `95 LQ1 Vert and TGP only have a rear sway bar. I thought it was one or the other and the two parts were not installed together. They must help "soften" the handling in the back in a way to give a smoother feel, at least thats the impression I feel when driving the `94 CS and TGP. 94 olds vert and jmjp5055 2 Quote
jiggity76 Posted July 17 Report Posted July 17 (edited) 5 hours ago, rich_e777 said: Yes, those figure 8 shaped springs cushioning the lateral links. My `94 3100 CS only has these aux. springs while my `95 LQ1 Vert and TGP only have a rear sway bar. I thought it was one or the other and the two parts were not installed together. They must help "soften" the handling in the back in a way to give a smoother feel, at least thats the impression I feel when driving the `94 CS and TGP. Interesting. I think it's an early W body thing and dependent on whether it's a sedan, coupe, or convertible, (Cutlass line of course). I think the newer cars maybe starting in 94 on...again, depending on body style, they just got a combination of those items. 55trucker would know I bet. Edited July 17 by jiggity76 94 olds vert and jmjp5055 2 Quote
White93z34 Posted July 17 Report Posted July 17 I've never seen those not on a Buick/Oldsmobile. I assume it was a way to get a softer ride for the "luxury" brand cars jmjp5055 and jiggity76 2 Quote
94 olds vert Posted July 17 Report Posted July 17 That's impressive for a MI car. It must have not have been driven in the winter. jmjp5055, jiggity76 and 95cutlass 3 Quote
95cutlass Posted July 19 Author Report Posted July 19 On 7/17/2025 at 7:51 PM, 94 olds vert said: That's impressive for a MI car. It must have not have been driven in the winter. Thank you, and yea it doesn’t appear so! Was one of the biggest selling points! 94 olds vert 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.