Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 44 of 44

Thread: Unrealistic

  1. #31

    Re: Unrealistic

    Quote Originally Posted by Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackBird21
    Our cars have awsome suspension geometry. Its just everything is too soft and flexes...
    Awesome geometry???......its just your basic McPherson strut front suspension with an independent monoleaf rear suspension.

    There is no way my Impala will out handle, out stick, out launch, or out fuck my Camaro.
    The camaro's I've seen have quite awful handling
    http://www.spudfiles.com
    Blast vegetables and whatever else you can think of! :laugh:

    1996 3500GP Coupe, "Bright White"
    3500 swap, 60degreeV6 1393 Grind Cam, Ported Intakes, Comp Cams Valve Springs, 65mm TB, Custom Pushrods, S&S Headers, 97 PCM with DHP Powrtuner, 2.5"; back to dual Hooker Aerochambers, SS Brake Lines, Addco Swaybar, KYB's, Intrax Springs, STB's, etc!

  2. #32
    BXX's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lorain, Ohio
    Posts
    8,196
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 491 Times in 385 Posts

    Re: Unrealistic

    Build both the suspensions decently and you will notice that the W will outhandle it.. Of course the W will need lowered to lower the center of gravity but it has independent suspension... Solid axles arent as good for corners compared to independent.

    Fbodies also have a shitload of chassis flex
    -08 Kia Spectra SX -2.0L BetaII/Auto
    -07 Chevy Uplander LT -3.9L LZ9/4T65e

  3. #33

    Re: Unrealistic

    Haha and our cars dont have chassis flex? Mine has flex out the ass even with it being lowered on stiff ass suspension... Shit with my suspension I have cracked my windshield from the stress points, but I would still bet, no gurantee that my friends stock '02 WS6 will wax my cars ass in turns, no problem.
    Im out

  4. #34
    Cam'ron's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    2,530
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts

    Re: Unrealistic

    Quote Originally Posted by badassoldspower
    Haha and our cars dont have chassis flex? Mine has flex out the ass even with it being lowered on stiff ass suspension... Shit with my suspension I have cracked my windshield from the stress points, but I would still bet, no gurantee that my friends stock '02 WS6 will wax my cars ass in turns, no problem.
    lol yup hang the ass end out and spin the fuck out of the back tires around any corner
    Cameron Hanlan 2010 GMC Terrain SLE-2 (V);,,,;(V) Why not Zoidberg?



    2004 Dale Jr Chevy Monte Carlo SS Supercharged - FOR SALE PM for info if interested

  5. #35

    Re: Unrealistic

    Quote Originally Posted by badassoldspower
    A bit late, but I would like to say that the comparison isint fair, If both vehicles had the same amount of mods done, in the same fashion, like equally modded as far as bolt ons in concerned, a damn W-body WILL NOT out handle a Y body, to think otherwise is simply ridiculous.
    Just making a general observation
    Lumina Z34 getrag equipped
    Mustang Mach 1
    Forester Daily Beater
    Slick is MY BITCH!

  6. #36

    Re: Unrealistic

    Quote Originally Posted by Canada
    There is no way my Impala will out handle, out stick, out launch, or out fuck my Camaro.
    I dunno. All of 3 ls1 f-cars I've owned have been absolutely terrible as far as handling goes... but its your impala..
    Lumina Z34 getrag equipped
    Mustang Mach 1
    Forester Daily Beater
    Slick is MY BITCH!

  7. #37

    Re: Unrealistic

    Quote Originally Posted by AWeb80
    People Don't Believe Me When I Tell Them How Good The Gp Handles.....It Gets Irritating Sometimes.
    i believe you...really do!


    the my gp will keep up with porche boxters on entrance ramps, (the real sharp ones) they just lose me when it straightens out

    DD - 1994 Pontiac Grand Pix SE - 204k Miles, TGP hood, 5-spokes, front and rear STB, rear lip spoiler
    Fun Car - 2004 Pontiac GTO - 65k miles, SAP Dual Exhaust, Short-throw, LS7 clutch, F-body Slave cylinder

  8. #38
    AWeb80's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    9,190
    Thanks
    177
    Thanked 877 Times in 525 Posts

    Re: Unrealistic

    there is one f-body around here that is strictly a auto x car and it has subframe connectors, sbt's, lowered, heavy spring rates....and 12" wide stick slicks on all 4 tires....now that car can freaking fly.....will beat my by about 4-6 seconds on a 45 second average course......

    but it takes a horrible riding car and slicks to beat me......

    mine, I don't have to trailer it home and it still rides great.

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazy K
    I LOVE AWEB
    Quote Originally Posted by Woll Smoth
    I'm a sexy bitch, but I can't hold a candle to you

  9. #39

    Re: Unrealistic

    Quote Originally Posted by nametnom
    Quote Originally Posted by badassoldspower
    Haha and our cars dont have chassis flex? Mine has flex out the ass even with it being lowered on stiff ass suspension... Shit with my suspension I have cracked my windshield from the stress points, but I would still bet, no gurantee that my friends stock '02 WS6 will wax my cars ass in turns, no problem.
    lol yup hang the ass end out and spin the fuck out of the back tires around any corner
    It's called drift, and it works like a charm.
    Hooah!<br /><br />2005 Buick Lacrosse CXL - 65000 Mi<br />Mtx Audio/Oznium.com LEDs/CherryBomb Exhaust<br />2001 Ford F-250 - 127000 Mi<br />7.3L Diesel/Bully Dog/MTX Audio<br />1994 Ford Thunderbird SC - 40xxx Mi<br />3.8L S/C /5sp Standard<br /><br />[quote author=MonteCarloChick link=topic=74381.msg1000110#msg1000110 date=1231563762]<br />Yeah it&#39;s no fun if they aren&#39;t screaming or crying.<br />[/quote]<br />[quote author=1LoudCutty link=topic=74381.msg1000663#msg1000663 date=1231684256]<br />Hickery Dickery Dock, Sounds Like You Need Some Cock<br />[/quote]

  10. #40

    Re: Unrealistic

    Ok despite the arguement, an F or a Y body are always gonna be sexier than a w, no question lol. Cant wait to get mine!
    Im out

  11. #41


    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    And it cost a lot less. What year is your Z06? I think I will upset some people with this statement, but vettes got popular and I don't think the newer style of vette is maybe as good as some of the older ones in terms of handling. I owned a 1984 which had not horse power to speak of, but boy did that thing ever handle nice. I got an opporunity to drive a 1999 Corvette and not only did it not handle well, it sounded like a bruick when you stepped on the gas compared to my car. When you stepped on the gas in my car is rumbled, it did not purr. Just my 2 cents worth and I know some will disagree.
    If you like the handling of the z34 have fun with it and go fast in the corvette. Best of both worlds.

  12. #42
    jeremy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Backseat Moderator
    Posts
    17,157
    Thanks
    236
    Thanked 742 Times in 413 Posts

    Why all the sudden replies to 4 year old threads?

    Quote Originally Posted by xtremerevolution View Post
    I don't like being told I'm wrong.................. I even more dislike being told I'm wrong by someone....................I despise it to a great degree when I'm told I'm wrong..............................

    Don't come to me talking as if you know exactly what you're talking about when you haven't the slightest clue......................

  13. #43
    cause noob
    1998 Monte Carlo Z34 (sold) | 2006 Monte Carlo SS (sold) | 2012 Camaro 2SS 45th

  14. #44
    Forum Moderator runt's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Saint Marys, PA
    Posts
    4,363
    Thanks
    306
    Thanked 454 Times in 277 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by dkas View Post
    And it cost a lot less. What year is your Z06? I think I will upset some people with this statement, but vettes got popular and I don't think the newer style of vette is maybe as good as some of the older ones in terms of handling. I owned a 1984 which had not horse power to speak of, but boy did that thing ever handle nice. I got an opporunity to drive a 1999 Corvette and not only did it not handle well, it sounded like a bruick when you stepped on the gas compared to my car. When you stepped on the gas in my car is rumbled, it did not purr. Just my 2 cents worth and I know some will disagree.
    If you like the handling of the z34 have fun with it and go fast in the corvette. Best of both worlds.
    Please watch the LAST replied dates before posting a reply. I know for a fact that this user shows up once every two years as the W is now gone if I'm not mistaken.

    So please be mindful of this when posting. Thanks.
    2003 Pontiac Bonneville SLE

Visitors found this page by searching for:

2002 dodge neon suspension geometry

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •